About this playbook
Most buying decisions form outside the marketer’s view. Buyers research independently, buying groups evolve, and AI shapes shortlists before sellers hear anything. This playbook builds a 2027 demand plan around buying progress rather than raw volume.
The planning system
-
Goals -
Signals + Context -
Buying Group -
Channels + Context -
Sales -
Measure
Introduction
Plan around buying progress, not just buyer activity
Few teams establish a formal process to evaluate and purchase a new solution. Buyers research independently, buying groups evolve, AI and other sources influence decisions, and much of buying progress stays outside the marketer’s view.
In 2027, the goal is not simply to collect more signals. It is to identify which signals – and which patterns – reveal meaningful buying progress.
Definition
Buying progress is observable evidence that a buying group is becoming more informed, more involved, or more aligned around a problem and potential path forward.
Planning principle
A simple principle for the plan ahead
As you evaluate your 2027 demand plan, ask two questions:
1.
How does this help us better understand buying progress?
Tip: Look for the signals, context, and buying-group activity that reveal what is actually developing.
2.
Does this help the buyer make progress?
Tip: Create experiences that answer questions, reduce uncertainty, and help the buying group move forward.
The strongest demand plans do both.
The rest of this playbook applies those two questions to goals, context, buying groups, channels, content, sales, and measurement.
Let’s dive in.
Set goals around buying progress
Goals shape the audiences, activities, and measures that follow, so precision matters. If the goal is lead volume, the plan will naturally optimize for more responses, but that does not tell you whether you are reaching the right buyers, expanding engagement across the buying group, or learning what matters to them.
Setting a goal around progress does not mean abandoning volume. It means adding context to the number, with evidence of what that activity produced inside the account. That connection may be harder to measure, but it creates a stronger case for performance and budget.
94%
of buyers
in groups of six or more report clear benefits from deciding together
Source: Forrester, 2026
1.Drive business outcomes
Frame your goals around outcomes that matter to buyers and the people approving spend.
2.Detect buying progress
Look beyond lead volume for evidence that engagement is deepening, expanding across relevant roles, and signaling greater priority.
3.Generate actionable learning
Use each program to learn which problems, roles, messages, and patterns of engagement matter, then apply those insights to improve what comes next.
Are your demand campaigns designed to address these key considerations?
| Goal type | Example 2027 goal | Evidence to watch |
|---|---|---|
Business outcomes | Increase engagement within priority accounts and audiences | Account penetration, ICP engagement, priority-role engagement |
Buying progress | Increase the depth and breadth of engagement within target accounts | Buying-group coverage, engaged roles, repeat engagement, priority signals |
Actionable learning | Generate buyer insight that improves future programs | Pain-point and role patterns, content/message engagement |
What does your current activity tell you about whether buying is actually progressing?
Distinguish activity from progress
Demand generation creates plenty of activity: downloads, registrations, visits, and intent signals. These individual actions are buying signals. They show where engagement is happening, but on their own, they do not prove progress.
Progress becomes visible when those signals begin to form a broader pattern across the account or buying group.
For example: One IT leader downloading a cloud migration guide is activity. If infrastructure, finance, and security stakeholders from the same account also engage around migration, cost, and risk, a broader pattern of progress is developing.
Neither guarantees a purchase. But the second gives you more to learn from and act on.
Activity vs. progress
Activity captures an action at a point in time. Progress appears as patterns develop across people, interactions, and time.
The table below shows the difference. The measures on the right do not prove someone will buy. They provide stronger evidence that engagement is developing.
| Activity A point-in-time signal | Progress A pattern developing across roles, signals, and time |
|---|---|
Downloads | Additional buying-group members engage |
Clicks | Engagement continues across additional content or topics |
Visits | Relevant buying roles begin to diversify |
Registrations | Pain, role, or priority information adds context |
Intent signals | Multiple signals emerge across people, topics, or time |
Ask yourself:
Do your current success metrics capture evidence of progress, or just activity?
Add context to buyer signals
Marketing teams have access to more buyer signals than ever. Those signals – intent data, web analytics, content activity, and first-party behavior – can show who is active and where interest may be forming. But more data does not necessarily create more understanding.
Your 2027 plan should account for the context you want to capture alongside those signals, including:
1. Challenge
What problem appears to matter?
2. Involvement
Who is involved, and what do they own or influence?
3. Urgency
How important is the issue right now?
4. Buying Group
Who else is involved, and is participation expanding?
Together, signals and context provide a clearer picture of what may be developing. They don’t predict a purchase. They help you understand what matters, identify patterns across the buying group, and determine what could help buyers continue.
At DEMAND.com, we call this the DEMAND Context Layer: Adding buyer context to the signals you already see.
For example, a content download shows activity. Knowing an infrastructure leader is researching data center consolidation because rising costs have made it a priority provides context you can use to inform what comes next.
Build context into your plan
Consider:
- What buyer context are you capturing today?
- What are you missing?
- Can you connect activity to challenges, roles, and urgency?
- Can you see participation across the buying group?
- How will what you learn influence what you do next?
Choose one type of missing context to capture in your next program, and decide where it will be recorded.
Plan for the buying group, not the individual lead
When multiple decision-makers interact with your content and your business, that is a strong signal.
Each member of the buying group has distinct questions, success metrics, and risk tolerances that must be addressed before the group reaches consensus.
Buying group members don’t consume identical content, so treating them as a single audience means that you will not meet their individual needs. Many deals lose traction when a key stakeholder’s concerns go unaddressed, or their priorities aren’t understood.
For each account you intend to reach, identify:
- Who is in the buying group, and who are you not reaching?
- What does each role need to resolve to reach consensus?
- Where is the collective alignment most likely to stall, and why?
- Which channel, piece of content, and messaging aligns with each buying group member?
Checklist
Is every buying role covered?
Identify the most important buying roles and their likely priorities, questions, and information needs. Can you answer “yes” to every question below? If not, your plan may be missing crucial information or buying roles.
Make every channel do two jobs
Buyer confidence forms across multiple channels, in a sequence no single plan can fully control. McKinsey’s 2026 Global B2B Pulse found that nearly every buyer now engages across in-person, remote, and digital channels, using an average of ten touchpoints throughout the purchasing journey.
Effective channel mixes therefore need complementary sources of reach and insight that work together to build a more complete picture of buyer behavior.
In other words, choose channels not only for what they deliver, but for what they reveal.
Help the buyer progress
- Reach buyers in the channels they prefer
- Match content format to the job the buyer is trying to do
- Reduce uncertainty and build confidence
Help you learn
- Reveal recurring questions and topics
- Show which roles and messages generate response
- Add evidence about buying-group participation
Planning callout
Put content where it performs best
Match content to the channel carrying it. The most effective campaigns reach buyers in their preferred channels, with content formats that help them build confidence and address pain points.
No single channel needs to do everything. As you evaluate your mix, consider the role each channel plays in helping buyers progress, and in helping you better understand that progress.
Source: McKinsey & Company, 2026 Global B2B Pulse
Choose channels for buyer value and insight
Buyers use different channels to answer different questions and make progress in different ways. Use this table to consider how each channel helps the buyer and what their activity can help you learn or capture.
| Channel | How this helps the buyer | What you can learn or capture |
|---|---|---|
Search | Find answers, diagnose problems, and explore potential solutions on their own terms | Search language, recurring questions, high-interest topics, and page-level behavior |
Organic social | Discover new ideas, perspectives, and useful information in an easy-to-consume format | Themes and formats that attract engagement from priority audiences |
Paid media | Discover relevant solutions and resources tied to their role, needs, or current challenges | Which audiences, roles, messages, and offers generate responses |
Content syndication and demand generation | Access deeper educational resources that help them understand challenges, evaluate approaches, and build knowledge | Known contacts, roles, content interests, and declared challenges or priorities |
Communities and peer forums | Learn from peers, ask questions, and get practical guidance based on real-world experience | Common objections, peer concerns, comparison criteria, and language buyers use |
Analyst channels | Understand the category, evaluate options, and validate potential vendors or approaches | The criteria analysts and buyers use to define and assess the category |
AI discovery | Quickly research questions, understand unfamiliar topics, and compare products or approaches | How accurately your company, products, and category appear in AI-generated answers |
Learn from peers and experts, follow relevant topics, and discover perspectives tied to their role | Engagement by company, role, topic, and – where identifiable – multiple contacts within an account | |
Customer advocacy | See how similar organizations have solved problems and what outcomes they achieved | The outcomes, use cases, and proof points that build buyer confidence |
Partners and ecosystems | Understand how solutions work together and fit within their existing technology or business environment | Engagement from shared accounts and interest in joint use cases or integrations |
Align content with the uncertainty it resolves
Buyers use content to answer questions, evaluate options, build internal agreement, and reduce uncertainty. Funnel stages can help marketers organize activity, but they don’t reveal what an individual buyer needs to understand or believe before they can move forward.
That matters across a buying group. A technical leader may be evaluating feasibility, finance may be questioning economic impact, and an executive may be weighing business risk. They’re part of the same decision, but they need different things from your content.
That doesn’t necessarily require more assets. Often, the opportunity is to better align existing content with the role, question, and uncertainty it can help resolve. The surrounding message, landing page, and follow-up can make the same strong asset relevant to different members of the buying group.
Plan content around the questions buyers need to resolve, not simply where they sit in a funnel. Confidence grows as uncertainty decreases across the buying group.
The approach in action
Imagine a company evaluating a major technology modernization initiative. Different members of the buying group may be resolving different questions at the same time:
| Who might be asking | What they need to resolve | Example buyer question | Content that can help |
|---|---|---|---|
Operations / IT leader | PROBLEM | Is the current environment creating enough cost, risk, or limitation to justify change? | Benchmarks, research, diagnostics, problem-framing content |
Technical / functional leader | APPROACH | Which path best addresses the problem without creating new complexity? | Frameworks, comparison guides, implementation guidance |
Finance / executive / procurement | PROOF | What evidence gives us enough confidence to move forward? | Customer evidence, analyst validation, business case, security and support information |
Don’t hand sales a lead.
Hand them context.
When sales receives only a name, company, and asset title, valuable context gathered during qualification gets lost. Passing along what marketing learned about the buyer’s needs, priorities, and reasons for engaging helps sales tailor outreach and continue the conversation with context.
As you build your 2027 demand generation plan, consider what information should accompany each lead:
- Business challenge: What problem appears to matter?
- Role and responsibility: What does this person own or influence?
- Reason for responding: What prompted their activity?
- Importance or urgency: How important does the issue appear to be?
- Buying-group activity: Are others from the account showing relevant activity?
Marketing and sales should also align on where this information lives and how it can be accessed. Some insights belong to the individual, while others become more meaningful across the broader buying group.
The goal is not to treat these signals as proof of readiness. It is to preserve useful buyer context so sales has a clearer picture of what may be happening within the account and what to do next.
What to look for in your plan
Consider how well your current plan accounts for the information provided with each lead.
| Information provided with the lead | Strong | Could be stronger | Needs improvement |
|---|---|---|---|
Business challenge | |||
Role and responsibility | |||
Reason for responding | |||
Importance or urgency | |||
Buying-group activity |
See how DEMAND.com adds buyer context to every lead
Measure quality alongside performance
Volume still matters. You need to know whether your programs are reaching the right audiences and generating enough activity to support your goals.
But volume alone does not tell you who is responding, what you are learning about them, or whether engagement is expanding across the buying group.
What did it generate?
What did we learn?
| What we want to know | Practical measures | Learnings |
|---|---|---|
Are we reaching the right audience? | Priority-account penetration; ICP coverage | Are we reaching the accounts and audiences the plan was built around? |
Are the right people responding? | Priority-role participation; role diversity by account | Are relevant roles represented, and is participation broadening? |
Are we capturing useful buyer context? | % with business challenge, role/responsibility, and urgency identified | Do we understand more about what matters, who is involved, and how important the issue appears to be? |
Is activity broader than one person? | Buying-group coverage; active contacts per account | Is relevant activity appearing across more of the buying group? |
Is a meaningful pattern developing? | Repeat activity; multiple signals across people, topics, or time | Are we seeing more than a single, isolated response? |
Turn reporting into optimization
Use what you learn to improve what happens next. If priority accounts are responding but the right roles are missing, adjust targeting. If certain business challenges generate activity across multiple roles, apply that learning to messaging and content. If activity remains isolated to one person, consider how the program can reach more of the buying group.
These measures are not meant to predict who will buy. They help you understand what is happening so you can make better decisions.
Practical rule:
Measure what you can observe, learn from what changes, and use those insights to improve what comes next.
Assess your 2027 demand plan
Together, the areas discussed in the earlier pages show where your 2027 demand plan is strong and where it needs attention.
Rate each area as Strong, Average, or Needs Improvement. Start with the area that needs the most attention.
| Section | Area | What good looks like | Strong | Average | Needs impr. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Who | Audience and buying group | Buying roles are identified, and missing stakeholders are named. | |||
Buyer problems | Identify each role’s problem, key questions, and unresolved concerns. | ||||
How | Content | Every asset answers a stated buyer question. Problem, approach, and confidence are all covered, and key assets are personalized by role. | |||
Channels | The mix covers discovery, education, engagement, and buyer signals; blind spots and over-reliance are identified. | ||||
What you know | Signals and context | Problem, People, and Urgency are captured; activity is separated from buying progress. | |||
Sales handoff | Problem, person, role, trigger, priority, and buying-group activity all travel with the lead. | ||||
What you do with it | Measurement | Report program output alongside what it revealed about demand. | |||
Optimization | Adapt the program based on what signals reveal, and review performance and quality throughout the campaign. |
Final pressure test
- Where does it help you better understand buying progress?
- Where does it help buyers make progress?
If either answer is unclear, you’ve identified an area of the plan worth revisiting.
Plan 2027 with greater context
Much of the B2B buying journey will continue to happen outside the marketer’s direct view. Buyers research independently, use AI and peer sources, and involve stakeholders with different priorities and concerns.
Your next step
Put buyer context to work in your 2027 plan
Your next demand program should help you understand who is engaging, what matters to them, and what sales needs to continue the conversation.
As you plan for 2027, ask two questions:
1.
Does this program help us understand buying progress?
2.
Does it help the buyer move forward?
Are you unsure how your current programs measure up? Review your 2027 demand plan with DEMAND.com and identify where stronger buyer context could help you understand and support the buying progress.
The planning system
-
Goals -
Signals + Context -
Buying Group -
Channels + Context -
Sales -
Measure
Questions for your next demand partner conversation
Choosing a demand partner requires more than comparing reach and lead volume. You also need to understand what buyer context the partner can capture and how those insights will be used during the program.
Use the questions below to assess what a potential demand partner can provide before you choose.
| Context | |
What context accompanies a lead? | Listen for specifics beyond name, title, and asset. If the answer is a list of form fields, the context stops there. |
Can you identify the Problem, People, and Urgency? | And how? Is it declared, inferred, or verified? |
| Buying group visibility | |
What buying-group visibility is available? | Can they show multiple roles engaging within one account, or only individuals? |
How do you distinguish isolated activity from a developing pattern? | Look for repeat engagement, participation from additional roles, and activity across related topics over time. |
| Quality and action | |
How is quality validated? | Ask what happens when quality fails, not just how they measure it. |
How do programs adapt based on what you are learning? | Mid-campaign optimization on live signals is different from a monthly report. |
How do you identify what may be preventing the buying group from moving forward? | Look for signs of momentum and where uncertainty remains. |








